GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
May 1960 | Dallas, Texas
4 pp
[> LOCATION Tz. | 0 4. TYPE OF OBSE ON Ground- Visual 0 Ground-Rador - A Ve a l AireIntercept Radar | 0JECT 10073 RECORD C | p= i. i 0 OR i. | | £0 J3 o/c | I 1s is possib
May 1960 | SW of Albans, West Virginia
4 pp
i Ni “112. CONCLUSIONS SW of I ai 0 Was Balloon | ) |0 Probably Balloon ~ | & TYPEOF OBSERVATION [© Possibly Ballcen § pp 0 Was Aircraft — | = 0 Ground-Rador | 0 Probably Aircraft inoculars 1
May 1960 | Tallassee, Alabama
4 pp
= TE | FERRE | Seep oa Beane ep = 4 mw oF Ta a a — 1 + So) eg Lp = ory io [bate - SL ~ |12. CONCLUSIONS 19 May |O Was Bolloon a RN Boa ws |8@ Probably Bellon | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP |
May 1960 | 4 Mi Nof Dillingham, Alaska
13 pp
0. Was Bolloon CX Probably Balloon | ~~ Possibly Bolloon Was Aircraft Probably Aircraft Possibly Aireraft Local Sa - | aa 29050072 ——— | . Air Visvel Eg 0 | Air-Intercept Roed
May 1960 | Rhodesia, Africa
5 pp
1 5. PHOTOS 7. | LENG" | ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP $2) . . 3. DATE-TINE GROUP 3. DATE-TIME GROUP LN smn dimiianian X Ground- Visual AirViwal ~ SOL | 6
May 1960 | Jaffrey Center, New Hampshire
5 pp
Bl igh 1 el Ti ly fo pl | MP PE EY | ——— (i ffl x Ta = Eg 112. CONCLUSIONS {0 Was Balloon 0 Probably Balloon Ta YYPE OF er or SOI TEE SR Possibly Balloon CR VOR NR 5 Bimal hes 10 Wa
May 1960 | Malden, Massachusetts
4 pp
"LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 9 course descending ATIC FORM 3129 (REV 26 sep 5 el dep = cl ews dg "CONCLUSIONS P rob ably Was Balloon Balloon Po
May 1960 | Mangham, Louisiana
8 pp
io Tra "CONC LUSIONS _ 0 Was Balloon | SNe panagEs |X Probably Balloon | 4. TYPE OF TET PRET Fd deh Possibly Balloon dat B Conical 0 Was Aircraft A Ground- Visual 0 Ground-Rodor {0 Probably Airc
May 1960 | Murfreesboro, Tennessee
3 pp
= — eS —— — = = = - — = : = ] > a - rr ni 0 8 pr . = a Ac ie La J —— EEE gy I — a: iy S— J —— = 1a. CONCLUSIONS ~ Wos Belloorn X Probably Bolloon | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP 4 TYPE OF OBSER
May 1960 | Bear Lake, Florida
3 pp
24 May 1960 ~~ |Bear Lake, Florida [0 [3 DATE-TIME GROUP | 4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION I~ round-Visvel DO Greund-Roder I 7. "LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 8. NUMBER OF
May 1960 | Orlando, Florida
4 pp
IW EN Ea Ti2. CONCLUSIONS lo Was Balloon a P robobly Bal i oon 10 Possibly Balloon [4 TYPE OF GRSERVATION — Mf Ground-Visual 0 Ground-Radar | 0 Ale
May 1960 | Southwestern Canada
11 pp
| 5 PHOTOS FES | 0 Yes HB Ne 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 1 sseared tO be losing alt] ATIC | FORM 329 (REV : 26 SEP $2)
May 1960 | North Miami, Florida
14 pp
I i | © |'a concLusions 0 Was Balloon 0 Probably Balloon Waste mamamnam: “TVYDE OF ABEEDV ATS . 0 Possibly Balloon 5. "DATE-TIME GROUP TE EE 4 "YYPE OF OBSERVATION 235 X Groun
June 1960 | Leadville, Colorado | Incident #6775
Other INCIDENT #6775 2 pp
File 6775 196! June 4, Leadville, Ceclorado 1 photo
June 1960 | Union City, Indiana | Incident #6781
INCIDENT #6781 2 pp
EIT Ee iin, "cof apn] [ir ier e——t— | | | File £721 June 6, 19(0 1 photo
June 1960 | Champaign, Illinois | Incident #6782
INCIDENT #6782 11 pp
10 photos
June 1960 | Sault Ste, Marie, Ontario Canada | Incident #6786
Other INCIDENT #6786 2 pp
June 1960 | Battle Creek, Michigan | Incident #6809
INCIDENT #6809 6 pp
June 1960 | Ponce, Puerto Rico
6 pp
[4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION EA bok i | X{ Ground-Visuel oo) PE CAA RL Sr Manton. TR 0 Al Views | B ET e—— ~ SOURCE Q Yes — BR No Saitama -— 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION .. wd
June 1960 | Salt Lake City, Utah
4 pp
—— — EES a — - — — == a == = > m vo m = —y - — = i I ~ Wos Balloon | RE . oii Probably Balloon "3. DATE-TIME GROUP Possibly Balloon l | Was Aircraft Probably Aircroft a Alr
June 1960 | Leadville, Colorado
12 pp
[10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF TING igi su claimed to witness object flying very high and fast, which resembled a pair of saucers rapidly oscillating. Object was extremely bright, almost lu
June 1960 | NW of Azores, Islands
3 pp
Ww { of Ses Islar lands "ATIC FORM ae ) (REV 2 , axp Ty 3 J Gr sund- Visual D Ground-Rader Description is ve Was Balleon Probably Bolloon Possibly Balloon W
June 1960 | Springfield, Ohio
Aircraft 22 pp
— == L = . —— E 1 = . - = E a a a = . TE FEET) SE srs ow Eee eee — — i i " PRTR 12. CONCLUSIONS |D Was Balloon ! |B Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon
June 1960 | 33, 50 N 144, 25 W, Pacific
4 pp
EW A I Wos Belloen | | ahi sits A Bhs asa | | oO | | __ 4 June 1960 sa, 50N 144,25W (Pacific) 0 Probably Belles | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP | 4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION —=————|0 Possibl
June 1960 | Dayton, Ohio
9 pp
of Ground-Visual - 8 Air Vial ne » atl a a =. : wo. . : { | 1 1 | La — — — — = Re 1 ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 RP 2) i ~ | 4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION |X Was Astronomical Au — aE io =
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1956-03-6785405-Cleveland-Ohio.pdf
LOCATION Cleveland, Ohio
DATE March 1956
EVALUATION Astro (Jupiter)
CASE NO 6785405
DECADE 1950s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 3
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 2 + 6 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. NN DATE I 3, DATE-TIME GROUP | 7. LENGTH OF 03SERVATION | ATIC FORM 329 (REV 24 32P 52) SS’ anh DEE a SE — a FE PARTI | wa fo, AT = FT mr = 5 = me 12. LOCATION 1806 Cleveland, 22 March Local 18. SOURCE Ohio | + TYPE OF SESE RATION *vGround- Visual 0 Alr-Visuel AE Civilian & AF (GOC) 0 Air-Intarcept Radar PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD | 12. CONCLUSIONS Yas Bolloon Probably Balleen Roseibly Balloon Yas Aircraft Probably Alrereft | Possibly Alreraft | Waa Azirenem zal Probably Astronomical Ponsibly Astronomicol | O Ground: Radar ES en fifteen minutes One round object, the size of the white in color, seen in the wast. head of a pin held at arms length, 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS estimated to be traveling at a speed Seen for 15 minutes, of 40-50 knots, direction unknown, 9. COURSE , Othar Insufflei ont Data for Evaluatio on | 0 Unknown i in west SO (I, oo n. "COMMENTS I |Possibly this sighting was gener-| ated by the planet Jupiter or the star Procyon. The duration of the: sighting does not substantiate |altitude and the estimated speed | of the object in the observers' | descriptions, Preliminary report |very garbled, a the