GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
May 1960 | Bently, Michigan
16 pp
ea = = od le WF Pie gv | o po ii SRE = bi PROJECT 10073 ) RECOR ) CARD | 12. "LOCATION RE Tar) | 12. CONCLUSIONS ik ~~ |0 Probably "Balloon i 1+ "YYPE OF OBSERVATION
May 1960 | Penns Park, Pennsylvania
5 pp
112. CONCLUSIONS Was Balloon |0 Probably Balloon "YYPE OF OBSERVATION |“ Possibly Balloon | Of Ground- Visual 0 Ground-Radar IR Eh Ney (8 Probably Aircraf
May 1960 | El Paso, Texas
13 pp
4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION | | XO Greund-VYisual 0 Ground-Rador = PHOTOS | 0 Ra | JTH OF OBSERVATION | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE | EA LE NC | met oce
May 1960 | Charleston, Maine
6 pp
I. DATE 8 PHOTOS raf T o ves 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 52) | Ie TPE OF OBSERVATION 0 Ground-Reder 0 Air-Interc
May 1960 | Vicinity Champagne, Yukon, Canada
5 pp
1 1% TYPE OF OBSERVATION 0 Ground-Visvel x Ale hi wal 0 Ground-Rador Do Alr-Intercept Radar ~|'8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS | | 9. COURSE Object
May 1960 | Las Vegas, Nevada
3 pp
PROJECT Wows ini CARD R 1+ 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ______________|© te { Ground-VYisual Ll i rh sal | 0 Air-Intercept Radar | 0 a Ground-Radar 0 8. PHOTOS ii
May 1960 | St Louis, Missouri
8 pp
| i 7. LENGTH OF F 08! SERVATION | ?2 Minutes [10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING ~~ low on the horizon. fandom included hovering and changes in and direction. ATIC PORM 329 29 (REV 26 s
May 1960 | Manus Island, Admiralties
4 pp
2. CONCLUSIONS o Was Balloon 0 Probably Balloon b 10 Possibly Bolloon | Was Aircraft Probably Aircraft Possibly Aircraft ¥ X Was Astronomical Meteor | Probably Astronomical | Civilian | Possi
May 1960 | 23 Mi Sof Joliet, Illinois
45 pp
________ EEE _ a — — _ EE Ea =a =a =| 3 =. = i= Hy = i= i TET EL "i b N —Y- i I " = = 0 ig =. Tp ir BE =_— (TE i i= 1 Log = Ra ' — 0 Was Balloon {0 Probably Balloon p
May 1960 | Bently, Michigan | Incident #6763
INCIDENT #6763 6 pp
May 28, 1960 Bentl Vy Michi gan 5 photos
May 1960 | Decatur, Illinois
19 pp
CONCLUSIONS Was Belloor Probably Bolleon Possibly Belloon Was Aircraft Probably Aircreoft Possibly Aireraft F Was Astronomical Probably Astronomical Smid db -— nom ig Other LDA&E (10 ation I
May 1960 | Glendale, Arizona
8 pp
|: | 1¢ srorved the path of a "dust de inversion existing in area, | "ATIC FORM 339 (REV 26 SRP 82) 0 Was Bolleon |0 Probably Balloon | eet) Pos
May 1960 | Eof Hawaiian Islands
3 pp
0 Woes Balloon 0 Probably Balloon DO. Possibly Belloon Was Aircraft Probably Aircraft Possibly Aireraft 0 0 D O Was Astron ! O Probably Astronomice
May 1960 | Trout Run, Pennsylvania
22 pp
Was Aircraft Probably Aircreft | Possibly Aireraft | Was Astronomical Probably Astronomical Possibly Astronomical ). Other — | | EX Insufficient Date for "Evaluation |
May 1960 | Bayonne, New Jersey
12 pp
LS : == il —— » - i - TS thy py SE Ey EE ET FEE = ORY ap = ose oo ss * w - i | ll = p= | [Wr | | = tem oar = ee Was Bolloon Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon Was Aireraft Probably Airc
May 1960 | West Hartford, Connecticut
6 pp
E317] | a esd wel | 00 Was Bolloon Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon Was Aircraft Probably Aircraft Possibly Aircraft Was Astronomical Probably Astronomic
May 1960 | Seattle, Washington
9 pp
PK “12. LOCATION Seattle, Washington "| 4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION JECT 10073 WEG ORD CARD | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP | | | | | | 1 | | ooo REE 1. a Ground-Redar L
May 1960 | Regina, Canada
7 pp
| 1 LL] | » Ground-Rodor | Leeal—p | © GroundsVisval | we ENR SOURCE ” filitary T= ‘NUMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE = | | | | | | ooo 0 Air-Intercept Rodar ! ooo — [7 LENG
May 1960 | Dayton, Ohio
18 pp
12. CONCLUSIONS Was Balloon Probably Balloon Possibly Balloon Was Aircraft Probably Aireroft Possibly Aircraft Was Astronomical Probably Astronomical Possibly Astronomical TI ad h
May 1960 | Southern Norway
3 pp
st ome = TPE A Wa aa ca = a me ; - i , i. | mf 1 | MITT PTRT p ROJECT 10 5073 RECOR i Ly LL o i fi a Li . Ma L Ey - Tha "CONCLU SIONS o Was Balloon 10 Probably Balloon - ossibly Bolloon |
May 1960 | Ottawa, Canada
5 pp
ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SRP 52) 0 Wos Bolloon 0 Probably | Sd | ————10 Possibly Balloon {0 Was Aircraft 10 Probably Aircraft 0 Ain Vid 0 Air-Intercept Rodar - Possibly Aireroft SOUR Cy C
May 1960 | Vicinity Waco, Texas
5 pp
rl mh i ly, wy BU = HE F ee eee | 12. CONCLUSIONS _ be he y 0 Probably Balloon : i 3. DATE-TIME GROUP x 10 Possibly Balloon | Gienund. Badass oO Was Aircraft
May 1960 | Wsw of Hawaiian Islands
3 pp
Load ease | TATIC | FORM 329 9 (REV : 26 sep 82) Ee To YYPE OF OBSERVATION al lida, oo X Ground-Visvel 0 Ground-Reador ‘ a anne _O Air-Intercept Radar Was Balloon Pr
May 1960 | San Gabriel, California
14 pp
- A | fo. BRIEF SUMMARY OF $10 OE | a Tf | Wr 11 EF f=} —— — 1 o TATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 s SRP Pry 7 + "YYPE OF OBSERVATION Of Ground- Visual 0 Alr r > V3 Ww ol Civilian |e
May 1960 | Loftfabal, Iran
2 pp
ar ey EE — == — — = = I" i Pw) B - — - - a A Bry ve Sp - - F Br - | | | |0 Wos Balloon | 0 Probably Balloon | 10 Possibly Belloon | Wos Aircraft Probably Aircroft Possibly
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1960-06-7813578-Coudersport-Pennsylvania.pdf
LOCATION Coudersport, Pennsylvania
DATE June 1960
EVALUATION Aircraft
CASE NO 7813578
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 16
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 2 + 4 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. Jbeudorspast, . ale = sal SUI ] ie | civilian eveaang toward the East, Objects disappeared to the West, Tie FORM 329 > REV 26 1 xp sn d 10 Was Balloon |O Probably Balloon | TYPE OF OBSERVATION |° Possibly Balloon | a Was Aireroft 1 Probably 5 Possibly Aircraft | Aircraft | a Airintercept Radar Was Astronomical |O Probably Astronomical Possibly Astrenemical |7. LEN GTH or OBSERVATION gai 1 UMBER OF OBJECTS | 9. COURSE |D Other | Lh | [5 | | = Insufficient Data for Evaluation | 12 minutes | two | varied EAST 2 EE ty ro | 10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING I of oY 2 ~ |). COMMENTS : - Report sent in two years after sight- | Nothing conflicting with analysis ing. There were two objects observed | as a/c. Report submitted on form | | to approach each other and join up, 164, Information sketchy, | | change directions and then disappear | | over the horizon, Sighting in early om