GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
September 1959 | Monterey Peninsula, California | Incident #6493
INCIDENT #6493 3 pp
File 6493 September 1 y 1959 terey Peninsula, Califernia Monterey Peninsula, Calf
September 1959 | Wallingford, Kentucky | Incident #6498
INCIDENT #6498 6 pp
Wallingford File 6498 September 7, 1959 5 photos
October 1959 | Telephone Ridge, Oregon
UNIDENTIFIED 6 pp
Was Balloon Probuobly Balloon Possi bly Belloon Ld WN “O | di Telephone Ridge, Oregon E BEER i eo AR EE | 12. CONCLUSIONS | i J. DATE-TIME GROUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | oo ooo
 GM
October 1959 | Keesler AFB, Mississippi
MILITARY 12 pp
Fie fd iw 9 DATETIME ey Local oo OL52 | ©) =~ | | PROJECT le RECCRD CARD 1 | 6. SOURCE O-Ground- Yi sual 0 AinVisuol OC Ground-Radar O Air-intercept Radar go oo
October 1959 | Seattle, Washington
Other Military 8 pp
O AirVisual 0 Air-Intercept Radar er r—— —— er —— | 8. SOURCE ’ inl 1 i. ] it ary 3. NUMBER OF OBJECTS 9. COURSE | oo oO, Wes Astronomicel | | Pro
October 1959 | Randolph AFB, Texas
MILITARY 5 pp
14 PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD l. DATE "2. LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS. {Was Balloon ! Probably Balloon Possibly Belleon | 4 Cet 59 Randolph AFB, Texas Be C ] O 13. DATE-TIME GROUP 3 4. TYPE O
October 1959 | Philippines
UNIDENTIFIED Military 5 pp
[ | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 1 » ALAS fo a TYPE] oF OBSERVATION Glass ile RE aes em ma # pad I Ground. Vi svol 3 Al Vi Vid ‘a Ground-Rader | Oo Air-lntercept Rada
 GM
October 1959 | Garreston, South Dakota
25 pp
i PROJECT rk RECORD CARD : my Ir TH yr hima a x E i i E 1 ji 112. CONCLUSIONS 2. LOCATION = 5. Det 59 Garret son. 8.0 10 Probably = J SEES, Arild 104 1 Je iia om me DA
October 1959 | Cincinnati, Ohio
Other (Unreliable Report) 18 pp
— re = — —- B= Lg pep A mm {YET A TAT SW Tp ars qa ed
October 1959 | Approx 13 Mi Wof Woodruff, Wisconsin
5 pp
TT —— ET —— TE EE mm ' - ir cn 1 = Eo e w PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 12 LOCATION | 1 eS em 3. DAT ETIME ‘GROUP ANGE Local &nt 33 { OMT Lm | Cc O23 949 Aoprox 13 Mi i | Y - np _
October 1959 | Approx 114 Miles Fast of Cape Canaveral, Florida
4 pp
3. DATE-TIME GRCUP Local LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 7. nos. EYE br | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD LOCATICN PROX 114 M | Lg Lo Veral, 2 TYPE OF OBSERVATION
October 1959 | Lincoln, Nebraska
UNIDENTIFIED Military 9 pp
PROJECT 10073 B RECPRY GARD iis — ——TT 112. CONCLUSIONS Er 72. LOCATION ee Was Balloon | o Probably Bal loon Possibly Balloon Was Aircraft Hl i 1 Ground-Radar Probiobly Alre
 GM
October 1959 | Bunker Hill AFB, Indiana
MILITARY 13 pp
——— — - 1 Nee 50 3. DATE-TIME GROUP ' ar |= al a Bi Tj p— ry mm = — ee — —— == # Bunker eesti Local eR | omr_ C7 / 10%” 5. PHOTOS PROJECT 10073 irl t Ground- V
October 1959 | Fort Sill, Oklahoma
7 pp
PROJECT Jes RECORD CARD aa Tm — Ea . = i i I = = 1 “LOCATION Fort Sill, Ckl 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ind=VYisual *¥i3lescope Ain Visual Ie 1 Greund-Radar o Air- Intercept Radar
October 1959 | Mobile, Alabama
7 pp
TIME GROUP - 1 CONCLUSION i = i 3 ai gt 5, - Yad di 15. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION |11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS {9. PHYSICAL
October 1959 | Castorville, Texas
3 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 2. LOCATION i Castorville, Texas O00 OO0OC | 3. DATE-TIME GR : 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION at | fa Bpund. ¥ CA ols 0 Ground-Radar E i ci t
October 1959 | 5 of Miami in Biscayne Bay, Florida
2 pp
5 og i % DATE-TIME GROUP Local ; : z GMT. |"5. PHOTOS 12 Ce | S of Mi TYPE OF OBSERVATION XXGround- Vi sual o Air Visual | & SOURCE Bay, Fla. O Groun
October 1959 | Blue Ash, Ohio
Other 5 pp
2 LOCATION PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD Blue Ash, Ohio 112. CONCLUSIONS Wes Balloon Probably Balloon occa 4. TYPE OF OBSE RYATION 0 Ground=Radar { 50 SU ol = Air
October 1959 | Elko, Nevada
1 pp
| ; | i ‘| who photographed PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD [ 1. paTE 12 Oct | Elko 3. New “12 LOCATION 3. DATE-TIME GROUP 5 "4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION 1 i A aes ok j Lota] ana lpia: CMT w
October 1959 | Eastbourne, England
24 pp
| | | 1. DATE | - ; | 3. DATETIME GROUP FE 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION E ho. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING ; pe of ki ite as Ee into the ATIC FORM 329 (REV 28 SEP 57) 11 Oct
October 1959 | Washington, Georgia
33 pp
| 3. DATE- “TIME GROUP |'5., PHOTOS wh 5. PH phy Local GMT — | | 8. SOURCE | 8. NUMBER TE OBJECTS | 9. i 10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING amer type substance, like sp
October 1959 | 18 Mi Nne Terre Haute, Indiana
5 pp
| THR Sint a | ° | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP 130659 i 18 mi NNE “19a 0 Ground-Visual Local : 3 ; 0 Air-Intercept Radar | 4. TYPE OF VATION. 0 Ground-Radar | 7. LENGTH O
October 1959 | Terre Haute, Indiana
4 pp
| . DATE = Terre Es i I ‘CONCLUSIONS o Wns Balloon Probably Bolloen 00 ; fel al 18: Ook 5C { 3. DATE-TIME GROUP ' emT_—_various 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Er-pround-
October 1959 | Dover AFB, Delaware
MILITARY 8 pp
1. pate 2 - Y as | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION PROJECT Wow. 3 R —————=""""""T2 LOCATION 15 0c D0 | Dover | | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION BGround-Visvel Local —- 4 eben
October 1959 | Franklin, Ohio
11 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD [RCBATE ©. 132 LOCATION “112. CONCLUSIONS Was Balloon Probably Balloon Possioly Balloon 17 Oct 59 | Franklin, Ohio E | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1967-10-6973264-Desoto-Missouri.pdf
LOCATION Desoto, Missouri
DATE October 1967
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 6973264
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 9
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 4 + 5 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. | 4. NUMBER oF CBIECTS | One 15. LENGTH OF OB3ERVATION go states FTD sep 3 0-325 (TDE) dal i rh. on il = iw le -— Tz Ti — - 1 11. rhe ‘observer first thought it was a star but then didn't know rver said that she heard PROJECT 100/73 RECORD SAR galt LOCATION Desoto, Miss ouri BRIEF SUMM ARY AND ANALYSIS Observer sighted a 1ight in the sky. The because it was so bright. whizzing sound. i ed COMIENTS + Since the observer was driving in unlikely that she would hear quite close or quite loud. Since | it is assumed that it wm is quite distant not associated with the sighting. The the noise, is consistent with those of a satellite. and that tho noise Previous sdit!>na of this form may be usad. # any noise unless the ob hues were Since it rs point of light description, other than F 1 i8 |