GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
70
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
YEAR:
10,808 case files — search or filter above
September 1959 | Monterey Peninsula, California | Incident #6493
INCIDENT #6493 3 pp
File 6493 September 1 y 1959 terey Peninsula, Califernia Monterey Peninsula, Calf
September 1959 | Wallingford, Kentucky | Incident #6498
INCIDENT #6498 6 pp
Wallingford File 6498 September 7, 1959 5 photos
October 1959 | Telephone Ridge, Oregon
UNIDENTIFIED 6 pp
Was Balloon Probuobly Balloon Possi bly Belloon Ld WN “O | di Telephone Ridge, Oregon E BEER i eo AR EE | 12. CONCLUSIONS | i J. DATE-TIME GROUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION | oo ooo
 GM
October 1959 | Keesler AFB, Mississippi
MILITARY 12 pp
Fie fd iw 9 DATETIME ey Local oo OL52 | ©) =~ | | PROJECT le RECCRD CARD 1 | 6. SOURCE O-Ground- Yi sual 0 AinVisuol OC Ground-Radar O Air-intercept Radar go oo
October 1959 | Seattle, Washington
Other Military 8 pp
O AirVisual 0 Air-Intercept Radar er r—— —— er —— | 8. SOURCE ’ inl 1 i. ] it ary 3. NUMBER OF OBJECTS 9. COURSE | oo oO, Wes Astronomicel | | Pro
October 1959 | Randolph AFB, Texas
MILITARY 5 pp
14 PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD l. DATE "2. LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS. {Was Balloon ! Probably Balloon Possibly Belleon | 4 Cet 59 Randolph AFB, Texas Be C ] O 13. DATE-TIME GROUP 3 4. TYPE O
October 1959 | Philippines
UNIDENTIFIED Military 5 pp
[ | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 1 » ALAS fo a TYPE] oF OBSERVATION Glass ile RE aes em ma # pad I Ground. Vi svol 3 Al Vi Vid ‘a Ground-Rader | Oo Air-lntercept Rada
 GM
October 1959 | Garreston, South Dakota
25 pp
i PROJECT rk RECORD CARD : my Ir TH yr hima a x E i i E 1 ji 112. CONCLUSIONS 2. LOCATION = 5. Det 59 Garret son. 8.0 10 Probably = J SEES, Arild 104 1 Je iia om me DA
October 1959 | Cincinnati, Ohio
Other (Unreliable Report) 18 pp
— re = — —- B= Lg pep A mm {YET A TAT SW Tp ars qa ed
October 1959 | Approx 13 Mi Wof Woodruff, Wisconsin
5 pp
TT —— ET —— TE EE mm ' - ir cn 1 = Eo e w PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 12 LOCATION | 1 eS em 3. DAT ETIME ‘GROUP ANGE Local &nt 33 { OMT Lm | Cc O23 949 Aoprox 13 Mi i | Y - np _
October 1959 | Approx 114 Miles Fast of Cape Canaveral, Florida
4 pp
3. DATE-TIME GRCUP Local LENGTH OF OBSERVATION | 7. nos. EYE br | 8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD LOCATICN PROX 114 M | Lg Lo Veral, 2 TYPE OF OBSERVATION
October 1959 | Lincoln, Nebraska
UNIDENTIFIED Military 9 pp
PROJECT 10073 B RECPRY GARD iis — ——TT 112. CONCLUSIONS Er 72. LOCATION ee Was Balloon | o Probably Bal loon Possibly Balloon Was Aircraft Hl i 1 Ground-Radar Probiobly Alre
 GM
October 1959 | Bunker Hill AFB, Indiana
MILITARY 13 pp
——— — - 1 Nee 50 3. DATE-TIME GROUP ' ar |= al a Bi Tj p— ry mm = — ee — —— == # Bunker eesti Local eR | omr_ C7 / 10%” 5. PHOTOS PROJECT 10073 irl t Ground- V
October 1959 | Fort Sill, Oklahoma
7 pp
PROJECT Jes RECORD CARD aa Tm — Ea . = i i I = = 1 “LOCATION Fort Sill, Ckl 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ind=VYisual *¥i3lescope Ain Visual Ie 1 Greund-Radar o Air- Intercept Radar
October 1959 | Mobile, Alabama
7 pp
TIME GROUP - 1 CONCLUSION i = i 3 ai gt 5, - Yad di 15. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION |11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS {9. PHYSICAL
October 1959 | Castorville, Texas
3 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 2. LOCATION i Castorville, Texas O00 OO0OC | 3. DATE-TIME GR : 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION at | fa Bpund. ¥ CA ols 0 Ground-Radar E i ci t
October 1959 | 5 of Miami in Biscayne Bay, Florida
2 pp
5 og i % DATE-TIME GROUP Local ; : z GMT. |"5. PHOTOS 12 Ce | S of Mi TYPE OF OBSERVATION XXGround- Vi sual o Air Visual | & SOURCE Bay, Fla. O Groun
October 1959 | Blue Ash, Ohio
Other 5 pp
2 LOCATION PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD Blue Ash, Ohio 112. CONCLUSIONS Wes Balloon Probably Balloon occa 4. TYPE OF OBSE RYATION 0 Ground=Radar { 50 SU ol = Air
October 1959 | Elko, Nevada
1 pp
| ; | i ‘| who photographed PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD [ 1. paTE 12 Oct | Elko 3. New “12 LOCATION 3. DATE-TIME GROUP 5 "4 TYPE OF OBSERVATION 1 i A aes ok j Lota] ana lpia: CMT w
October 1959 | Eastbourne, England
24 pp
| | | 1. DATE | - ; | 3. DATETIME GROUP FE 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION E ho. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING ; pe of ki ite as Ee into the ATIC FORM 329 (REV 28 SEP 57) 11 Oct
October 1959 | Washington, Georgia
33 pp
| 3. DATE- “TIME GROUP |'5., PHOTOS wh 5. PH phy Local GMT — | | 8. SOURCE | 8. NUMBER TE OBJECTS | 9. i 10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING amer type substance, like sp
October 1959 | 18 Mi Nne Terre Haute, Indiana
5 pp
| THR Sint a | ° | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP 130659 i 18 mi NNE “19a 0 Ground-Visual Local : 3 ; 0 Air-Intercept Radar | 4. TYPE OF VATION. 0 Ground-Radar | 7. LENGTH O
October 1959 | Terre Haute, Indiana
4 pp
| . DATE = Terre Es i I ‘CONCLUSIONS o Wns Balloon Probably Bolloen 00 ; fel al 18: Ook 5C { 3. DATE-TIME GROUP ' emT_—_various 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Er-pround-
October 1959 | Dover AFB, Delaware
MILITARY 8 pp
1. pate 2 - Y as | 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION PROJECT Wow. 3 R —————=""""""T2 LOCATION 15 0c D0 | Dover | | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP | 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION BGround-Visvel Local —- 4 eben
October 1959 | Franklin, Ohio
11 pp
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD [RCBATE ©. 132 LOCATION “112. CONCLUSIONS Was Balloon Probably Balloon Possioly Balloon 17 Oct 59 | Franklin, Ohio E | 3. DATE-TIME GROUP
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1966-10-8279604-Yonkers-NewYork.pdf
LOCATION Yonkers, New York
DATE October 1966
EVALUATION Not recorded
CASE NO 8279604
DECADE 1960s
TYPE Sighting
PAGES 12
SOURCE [OPEN IN NEW TAB ↗]
VERIFICATION must be CORRECT to submit form.
What is 8 + 9 ?
REASON (select all that apply)
0 / 500
Or contact Glitch N. Matrix directly:
mailbox@glitchymatrix.com
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. [\. DAT: - TIME GROUP | 30 Oct, 66 13. source ~~ Civilian 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS ene |S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 4-5 minutes l6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION 7. COURSE == 8. PHOTOS 0 Yes MW Ne 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 7 Yas FORM: D sFp 43 0-329 (TDF) a ud PROJECT LOCATION Fe Yon! kers, new forg IIS REGURD ae one witness HERE —— i e— : 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Observer reported watching a star like object in the sky that moved to the left and then to the right. It appeared as a nermal star =xpancded and became much brighter. The object disappeared “rom view when it meved off behind some trees, The observer did nel provide any indication as te what direction the object was traveling. Mhé Inférmatien submitted is insufficient in that essential data is lacking. PBravisrma asditlsma af wile Fara maw bas ima 10. CONCLUSION Insufficient data fur evaluation