OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.
& i a gl, Wg Wo = w al © EE —
4 -
BITS
JAY a sd
ye
hot id Ar
| Ej
-s i
TYPE OF OBSERVATION |CO
er
VISUAI
XEN
9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
! mE WE ow
(TDE)
Cal ARILLO
|e. ‘CONCLUSION
» CALIFORNIA
INSUFFICIENT TATA FOR
| |11. BRIZF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
‘The observers signted a bright bluish white light.
VOAORTID
VMBNTS: The observers at one point described the light as
| simply a lignt, yet in another as a larg ge fireworks sparkler
No mention is made if there were any sparks or not. Also
| the distance of the light is given 5s 100 feet but it could
lhave been miles away." Camarillo is quite close to several
lairficlds. The sighting may have been of a plane, a meteor,
|]a nct air ballon, & weather ballon, etc. However, since the
| sighting is of a light it does not really meet the definition
jo e UFO as given in AFR 80-17. All that can be said is that
{1 there is not enough information to determine what the light
| was attached to.
Previous scitlons of this form may be usad,