GlitchyMatrix
10,808
CASE FILES
71
UNIDENTIFIED
668
MILITARY
639
INCIDENTS
[< GLITCHYMATRIX]
10,808 case files — search or filter above
CASE DETAILS
FILE 1955-01-6965163-30MiECochise-NewMexico.pdf
LOCATION 30 Mi Ecochise, New Mexico
DATE January 1955
EVALUATION UNIDENTIFIED
CASE NO 6965163
DECADE 1950s
TYPE Sighting
OBSERVER Military
PAGES 1
STATUS CASE MISSING
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading. • l PROJECT 10073 RECOI~D CARD , 1. DATE 2. lOCATIO N 12. CONCL USIONS fJ Ylos Oolloon 1 .T:1uua ry 19 5 5 _ ~O_ }I:!:_ ~ _J;o £11 !.§.~ ,,---'N-~w M~&i G.Q_ ~ P rubobl y Dolloo n -3.-DAT - -· --·-- ------ - - E·-TIME GROUP 4 . IY PE OF OBSERVAT I ON Possibly Holloon 0 Wos Ai rcr a ft Loco l _ __ _ _ ,_ -·-----· 0 Groo.. n d- Vi suo I rJ GrCJVIf U· Rodo r 0 P robobly Aircraft Gli. -riQ -=---=:-:= 1L I '-_...:: - l3 "..t - 1 •'7. /1 .... I -·=====::.:.::::=:. - --- .. - ... __ 6. :N_SUURCE I.X A__i r· V_i r.u ol 0 A ir- Inte r cep t R<•dar
================================================================ PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD -- TRANSCRIPTION File: 1955-01-6965163-30MiECochise-NewMexico.pdf Transcribed from document image by Claude Sonnet 4.6 ================================================================ FIELD 1 -- DATE: 1 January 1955 FIELD 2 -- LOCATION: 30 Mi E Cochise, New Mexico [Note: Cochise is a community in Cochise County, Arizona. 30 miles east of Cochise, AZ places this sighting over the border region of extreme southwestern New Mexico, in the vicinity of the Peloncillo Mountains or the Lordsburg/Animas area.] FIELD 3 -- DATE-TIME GROUP: Local [blank] / GMT 01/1344Z [Note: New Mexico observes Mountain Standard Time (UTC-7) in January. 1344Z converts to approximately 0644 MST -- pre-dawn or early nautical twilight on New Year's Day. Civil twilight in southern New Mexico at this date is approximately 0700 MST; at flight altitude the sky lightens somewhat earlier.] FIELD 4 -- TYPE OF OBSERVATION: Ground-Visual [ ] Ground-Radar [ ] Air-Visual [XX] Air-Intercept Radar [ ] FIELD 5 -- PHOTOS: No [X] FIELD 6 -- SOURCE: Military pilot instructor FIELD 7 -- LENGTH OF OBS: 5-7 minutes FIELD 8 -- NUMBER OF OBJECTS: one FIELD 9 -- COURSE: ESE to WNW FIELD 10 -- BRIEF SUMMARY: Military pilot flying in B-25 a/c as instructor, turned to student & first saw object which he described as large (120-130 feet across) metallic, disc shape, looked like two pie tins placed together at their rims. During time of sighting, object changed its position to both face and observer's a/c with both its edge forward, and w/its circular surface exposed to view. Object paralleled aircraft and disappeared after approx 7 minutes. FIELD 11 -- COMMENTS: ATIC Form 164 sent to observer but no further investigation directed. (No Report in File) FIELD 12 -- CONCLUSIONS: Unknown [X] Form: ATIC FORM 329 (REV 26 SEP 52) [Single-page file. No supplemental documents present. ATIC Form 164 (the witness questionnaire) was mailed to the observer but is not included in this file; the comments note "No Report in File," indicating either the form was not returned or the response is absent from the record.] ================================================================ SEARCH INDEX TERMS ================================================================ Cochise Arizona New Mexico border southwestern New Mexico Peloncillo Mountains Lordsburg Animas 1955 January New Year B-25 Mitchell bomber trainer military pilot instructor student two observers air-visual metallic disc lenticular shape two pie tins circular large 120 feet 130 feet size estimate orientation change edge-on face-on paralleled aircraft unknown pre-dawn dawn twilight 0644 MST 1344Z ESE WNW course maneuvering no report in file ATIC Form 164 no investigation disc shape classic saucer shape military flight training instructor pilot ================================================================ CASE ANALYSIS -- Claude Sonnet 4.6 ================================================================ THE OFFICIAL CONCLUSION The case is carried as Unknown -- specifically the Unknown checkbox, as distinct from Other UNIDENTIFIED. In Blue Book practice this distinction matters: UNIDENTIFIED generally meant investigators had sufficient data to evaluate and still could not explain the object, while Unknown often indicated incomplete data. The comment field here confirms the gap: "No Report in File." The ATIC Form 164 questionnaire was mailed to the observer and not returned, or the return is not present in this file. No further investigation was directed. The Unknown classification reflects what they had, not what they concluded about it. WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS The primary observer was a military pilot instructor flying a B-25 Mitchell on what appears to have been a training flight. He turned to address his student and at that moment first saw the object -- meaning the student was also present and presumably observed it as well, though no separate student account exists in this file. The description recorded on the card is specific: one object, 120 to 130 feet across, metallic, disc-shaped, its appearance comparable to two pie tins placed together at their rims. That image is precise -- it describes a lenticular form, widest at the equator, tapering to a defined edge. The instructor knew what aircraft look like. A B-25 wingspan is 67 feet; the instructor estimated the object at nearly twice that, and appears to have made that estimate with some confidence. During the approximately five to seven minutes of the sighting the object changed its orientation, presenting both its edge profile and its circular face to the observers. It then paralleled the aircraft before disappearing. Course was ESE to WNW. The timing was early: 1344Z on January 1 converts to approximately 0644 Mountain Standard Time, placing the sighting in nautical twilight or very early morning conditions over southwestern New Mexico. At altitude the sky lightens before civil twilight at ground level, so visibility from the cockpit may have been better than the time implies. In any case the observer described what he saw in terms that require good visual conditions -- metallic surface, disc contour, edge versus face orientation. He was seeing the object clearly enough to characterize it in structural terms. POINTS OF INTEREST -- WHAT GIVES ME PAUSE The size estimate of 120-130 feet is the most compelling single detail. Military pilots calibrate size estimates against familiar references. This instructor was sitting in a twin-engine aircraft he knew intimately. His estimate of roughly twice a B-25 wingspan is not an offhand guess; it is a trained observer making a comparison against a known standard. For the object to be that large and still appear disc-shaped with a clean lenticular profile rules out most small or ambiguous phenomena. The orientation changes deserve attention. The object shifted from presenting its edge to presenting its full circular face, then back. This is not what a balloon does, not what a cloud does, and not what a distant aircraft does in normal flight. A tumbling object would produce irregular, inconsistent aspect changes. The description implies a controlled shift from one orientation to another -- the object presenting itself differently to the observers at different moments. The paralleling behavior is the second active element. The object flew alongside the B-25 before departing. Like the Guam case, this is not a passive fly-by -- it is relative motion maintained with respect to the observing aircraft. The location adds quiet context. Southwestern New Mexico in January 1955 is remote high desert, not far from the White Sands Missile Range complex and the testing ranges that dominated that corner of the country in that era. Unusual aerial objects over this region carried more potential explanations than they would elsewhere -- but an experimental craft of those dimensions, with that behavior, paralleling a training aircraft before departing, does not fit the profile of a test vehicle operating normally. The absence of any follow-up investigation is the most frustrating element. A military instructor pilot with a student aboard, in daylight-approaching conditions, watching a large metallic disc-shaped object maneuver alongside his aircraft for up to seven minutes -- this warranted more than mailing a questionnaire and directing no further inquiry. What the instructor would have written on that Form 164, had he returned it, is the question this file cannot answer. BOTTOM LINE The observer is credible and the description is specific. The size estimate, the structural detail, the orientation changes, and the paralleling behavior together describe something that does not reduce to any conventional explanation available to a 1955 analyst. The Unknown classification is the correct result given the data deficit, but the data deficit was partly institutional -- no follow-up was directed, and whatever the instructor wrote on the questionnaire (if he wrote anything) is gone. This case is small on paper and large on what it implies. A military instructor pilot over New Mexico in early January 1955 watched something the size of a large aircraft, shaped like nothing in any known inventory, fly alongside him for several minutes and then depart. The record card is all we have. ================================================================ END OF DOCUMENT ================================================================