October 1954 | Nouasseur, Frenchmorrocco
1X. SOURCE
15. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION
1
MILITARY
| 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION
GROUND- THEODOLITE
[0 Yes
(7 No
i —— be —— i —— ee Bb
11. DATE - TIME GROUP
GM
OCR recovered text quality varies — view PDF for accurate reading.
se Bl] 0 el Rl ee mg i Ho om i ma el ie iim A ap ry
Zo TiME CRO uP
- wr - = ar a x= em - mc: - ame lomo m—
LEE - = a x = ==
2. LGCATICH
il
|
|
on
#& = i
i. F FEE FE * ww - . = em hmm
— k# : og 5 # I i J md ii | J a | 1 I . ed EE) fen em de a het Ee L wh
i Fl | a fe
TRCE 110. CONCLUSION
a wu | 3 elm de a ae ep ode gy ow
sllitury Sigshving: Other:
- cbable bis HAG Tals yr
ly ¥ NUMBE 2 OF OBJECTS | Rader: Other: (BIADS ANL ANOMCLCUS JaClaC. ilu)
i a
d's £2 Cx Lf
| mr - —— — — T
. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION |11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
Li
|
On Oct 6, events besan at 2000 hours with the visual si noi-
that continued for 3/4 nour of an cbject over the occcan
bearings of 290 deg enc an elevation of 10 to 15 c=
Grouad-'isual (RADAR) object displayed no appreciable motion. Tne mioszd
7. COURSE a racars, were,at 2045 asked to qo into searcn ode and loos
| | for the object sighted visually. Tae result was that ony
{ See Case | objects were quickly picked up end tracked.
3. PHOTOS
=e La SE
BE |< TYPE or OBSERVATION
a ©
ct
COMMITS: See University of Colorado Report.
7 Yeas
| JZ No
7. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
FORM
sy i ig] ny = EE «er 0 RR CT li Hg Bi OH Bem Ca
-—. we Way pe =